GARY COPELAND: I AM THE TEAR ON YOUR CHEEK ... I AM DRUID!
by Marcus Rubyman, staff writer.
[Oct. 28, 2002]
He is the river that flows from the mountain, he doesn't care if his own
party has revoked its endorsement, and if the government is covering up
UFO secrets -- he will expose the truth!
Those are some of the startling
statements made by California Libertarian Party gubernatorial candidate
Gary Copeland in an exclusive interview with
the Weekly Universe.
Copeland, who hopes to replace
Democratic governor Gray Davis, in the November 2002 election, first drew
national media attention due to his religion -- he is a self-proclaimed "Druid Existentialist."
In an exclusive e-mail interview, the Weekly Universe asked Copeland how his Druidism might
affect his policies once in the governor's office.
replied: "I am the tear on your cheek and a ray of sunlight on a winter's
day. I am the river that flows from the mountain and the fire that
lights the darkness. I am the point of a spear in heat of battle
and the calm that stretches over the ocean. I am the death of a loved
one and the seed of your child. I am Druid."
Druidism was eclipsed last September when, during a third party candidates
debate sponsored by KABC 790 AM, Copeland spat upon moderator Brian
had been embroiled in a heated exchange with Copeland on the issue of illegal
immigration. (The Libertarian Party advocates open borders).
Calling Copeland a "lunatic," Whitman muted Copeland's mike so that he
could speak uninterrupted, whereupon Copeland rose to leave the studio
-- but not before spitting
Whitman announced his intent to file criminal assault charges against Copeland,
the candidate initially refused to apologize. "Since I could not
say what I believed, I thought I would show what I believed," Copeland
explained to media.
Libertarian Party officials apologized for Copeland and, led by state
LP Chairman Aaron Starr, withdrew their support. However, California
election laws forbade the LP from replacing Copeland at this late date,
so he remains on the ballot as the official Libertarian Party candidate
to remove Copeland from the ballot, the LP urged members to write-in Art
Olivier's name for governor. Olivier had served as mayor of Bellflower,
and was the LP's Vice Presidential candidate (Harry
Browne's running mate) in 2000. To date, Olivier has done little
later did an about-face and apologized, but the California LP refused to
support Copeland. As one party official explained to a Weekly Universe
source, Copeland's act was "too disgusting." But a dissident LP group
(including Secretary of State candidate Gail
Lightfoot) is supporting Copeland over Olivier (perhaps partly because
California has to date not certified Olivier as an official write-in candidate).
position is that he is the official LP candidate, because he was elected
in the primary and is recognized on the state ballot, so the statements
of a few LP officers are irrelevant to his candidacy.
Weekly Universe asked Copeland how he felt about the LP's refusal to reinstate
their support, Copeland issued this startling exclusive statement to the Weekly Universe: "Who cares?"
are torn over the issue of how to respond to 9/11, the Weekly Universe
asked Copeland how the U.S. should handle Iraq in particular, and the threat
of terrorism in general. Copeland replied: "We should be fighting
for Liberty, not against terrorism."
aside, the Weekly Universe's transdimensional readers know that perhaps
the most pressing issue facing the California intersect of the space-time
continuum is the bizarre phenomena of alien abductions, crop circles and
UFOs. The Weekly Universe pressed Copeland for his position on these
most crucial issues:
WU: "Do you think the government is
hiding information about UFOs?"
Copeland: "I don't have enough information to
make a decision."
WU: "Any opinions on what UFOs may be, what
people are seeing?"
Copeland: "I don't know."
WU: "Is there anything a governor can do to
learn or expose the truth, if it's out there?"
Copeland (finally relenting): "I don't know
if the state is involved, but I would always work to expose the truth."
Weekly Universe will hold a future Copeland administration to the above
statement as a sacred vow to expose the truth about UFOs -- if it's out
there. The Weekly Universe also vows to keep readers appraised of
other candidates' statements on these most important issue.
polls show Copeland attracting 4% of California voters, putting him in
fourth place. (Green Party candidate Peter Camejo is running third, with 9% of voters.) Trailing
Copeland (in no particular order) are the Natural Law Party (which in 2000
received the support of filmmaker David
Lynch) and American Independent Party candidates. The Reform Party, while enjoying permanent ballot status
in California, did not field a gubernatorial candidate for 2002.
for a summary, Copeland told to the Weekly Universe: "I am a husband, father,
man of faith, and CEO of a bio-information firm. I want my children
to enjoy the free and diverse society envisioned by Jefferson, Paine, and
Adams. For a more prosperous and more compassionate California, I
urge you to vote Libertarian in the election on November 5, 2002."
also provided the Weekly Universe with a breakdown of his positions on
various specific issues:
an issue based on differing judgments about the first moment of genuinely
human life. Different individuals make different judgments, and this
is why there will never be a "government solution" to abortion. Abortion
will always be up to the individual, her doctor, and their personal faith.
I oppose all government funding of abortions.
* Meeting California's Energy
"Our State and
Federal government take 20 to 30% in taxes of the money you spend on gasoline.
Governments have no incentive to encourage an alternative fuel. There
is only one quick solution to the addiction of our government to oil taxes.
The free market offers the only way forward, and it is nothing more radical
than Econ 101: Prices set by supply and demand both encourage more
supply and restrain demand. Encouraging more supply promotes competition,
and allowing higher prices promotes conservation and alternative energy
sources. When government stays out of the picture, this system works
got us into our current energy problems. Gray Davis won't get us
out. Davis committed the State to expensive long-term electricity
contracts and consumers will be required to pay them off by further restrictions
on the market."
* Health Care
care system is 'sick' but the most of the 'cures' proposed by Republicans
and Democrats are regulations that attempt to micromanage and treat the
symptoms and not the disease. The 'disease' is a lack of consumer
choice and control over health plans. Due to tax incentives, most
of us get insurance through our employers instead of purchasing it on our
own. Employer-provided health plans are tax-free but individually
purchased health plans are not. The patient, as the paying customer,
should be in control.
"I would support
a system of medical vouchers that low-income families could use to purchase
health care or insurance. I would establish incentives to use the
money wisely, with any unused part of the annual allowance 'rolled-over'
for future medical needs.
on hospitals are forcing emergency rooms to close their doors, which give
patients with no place to go in an emergency. Misguided regulations
intended to enforce common human decency are rapidly destroying our health
* Crime Prevention
"The State of
California is currently in debt between $20 and $30 billion. The
State spends in excess of $25 billion in drug related enforcement in an
attempt to stop the production, sale and use of illegal drugs. If
you are fortunate enough to have a living parent or grandparent who remembers
the 1920s, you might ask them about Prohibition. When alcohol was
illegal, millions of people still drank, and the illegal booze market gave
rise to violent criminal gangs. Sound familiar?
abuse of alcohol is a significant social and medical problem, but there
are no drive-by shootings between rival liquor stores. Ending
drug prohibition and putting a 10% use tax on drugs could fund law enforcement
and medical vouchers. This revenue would be in excess of $10 billion
a year. Addiction is part of human nature and we need to treat
it, not create an opportunity for criminals."
* Death Penalty
"I do not believe
the government should have the right to kill. I would, however, allow
the victim's closest relatives to make the choice of what punishment should
befall the convicted killer, whether execution or life in prison.
only a public issue when the government owns the land and trees.
Standing timber should be sold or transferred to private ownership.
Conservationists should have the opportunity to take title of forests,
and choose not to harvest them, or to manage them optimally for the health
of the forests. Private organizations like the Nature Conservancy
are the solution to our forests' future health."
* Offshore Oil Exploration
"This is a land
ownership issue, which is in dispute because the land is not owned
by anyone, but controlled by politicians. I think it would be wise
to sell the land rights under the sea to whoever wants to bid for them,
including those who would never develop it. Giving welfare subsidies
in the form of drilling rights to oil companies is not a way to create
free markets in energy."
* Gun Control
has demonstrated that widespread handgun ownership, including concealed
carrying of guns, reduces crime, particularly crimes against women and
elderly people. The insane 'good intentions' of those who would restrict
guns are contributing to higher crime rates in all jurisdictions that have
adopted them. Britain and Australia, for example now have higher
incidences of home invasion and rape. Libertarians support the 2nd
Amendment’s individual right to keep and carry weapons."
* The State Budget Crisis
"For the year
2002, the budget of the State of California is $109 billion, which works
out to about $3,100 per resident, or $12,400 for a family of four.
If each family had to pay this amount, cash out of pocket, there would
be widespread outrage. Citizens would demand to know where the money
is going and what they are getting for their money.
"But the politics
of taxation is the art of offering as many people as possible the illusion
of getting something for nothing. Business taxes, payroll taxes,
deductions, credits, and heavy taxation of "the rich" hide the true
cost of the government behind a combination of higher prices, lower wages,
and lost economic opportunities.
the politicians' ravenous appetite for our hard earned dollars is so huge
that it cannot be completely hidden, and Californians are hit square in
the face with income and sales taxes that are among the nation's highest."
* Balancing the State Budget
want to cut the State budget sharply and abolish the income tax.
Many items in the State budget are either unnecessary or are things we
as individuals could better provide for ourselves if we were relieved of
the burden of taxation.
"One of the
biggest single items in the state budget is education. California
spends over $7,000 per student. If we assume a reasonable average
class size of 20 students, that's $140,000 per classroom. Generously
pay the teacher half of that, and we still have $70,000 a year to provide
classroom space and supplies for 20 students. Visit your child's
classroom. Do you see $70,000? Where is the money going?
43% of the State's revenue is derived from income taxes, roughly $40 billion.
Most of these funds collected are in the General Fund, which is a catchall
for government projects requested by the governor and the legislature.
There are, of course, some essential services that only the State can provide.
The fairest and most efficient way to pay for state services is to charge
people for the services that they use."
* New Taxes
Governor Davis and the legislature are scheming to impose a tax increase
to cover their latest spending binge, which has produced an estimated $20
billion budget deficit. When they tell you a tax increase is "absolutely
necessary," it might be worthwhile to remember that for the first half
of California's existence, we got along fine with no income tax.
Only in 1935 was a State income tax imposed.
of taxation is not only a matter of money, it is also a matter of privacy
and efficiency. In order to enforce increasingly complex tax rules,
nearly every economic transaction, from a few coins into a candy machine
to a multimillion-dollar business deal, must be reported to and tracked
by the government."
* Tax Cuts
to taxation is integral to my Libertarian approach to the role of the government
in our lives. I seek to be the leader of the government of California,
not the ruler of the people of California. The role of government
should not be to rule over people but to work as an unobtrusive servant
to the people, efficiently performing essential functions. Let's
lead the rest of the country by ending the bureaucracy and inefficacy of
California's State Income tax.
"Here are just
some of the more questionable functions of California's Government: California
Debt and Investment, Committee on Aging, Fair Political Practicing Commission,
California Alternative Energy Political Reform Act, Commission on Tax Relief
Unallocated Capital Outlay, Advisory Commission Technology Trade and Commerce
Agency, High-Speed Rail, California Debt Limit Allocation, Hastings College
of the Law, California State Summer School for the Arts, Advanced Transportation
Financing, California Tax Credit Allocation Committee."
* Three Strikes Law
Strikes' concept has been abused by law enforcement and prosecutors.
It should be amended to exclude all non-violent crimes, and current inmates
who are serving long sentences for non-violent 'third strike' crimes should
be immediately released."
* Campaign Finance
have been precluded from speaking to groups because of Campaign Finance
reform. Our misguided campaign finance laws are turning our government
into a playground for millionaires. I support measures that would
promote full disclosure of a candidate's source of funds, but I oppose
our current over-regulated system that only establishes a maze of reporting
requirements and barriers to fundraising for candidates, like me who do
not start with a personal fortune."
* Government Education
"The state pays
$7,058 per student this year for education. Education represents
$42.9 billion of the $109 billion California state budget.
"With the advent
of the Internet, the face of learning requirements has changed considerably.
Individuals need to be able to learn at their own pace and excel in those
attributes, which best fit their intellectual abilities. Internet
technology allows our children to use information technology at a far greater
rate and this should be the basis of their educational development. California's
parents should be able to keep their tax dollars and use the money to send
their children to the schools of their choice.
model is based upon the needs of early 20th century industrial America.
Classrooms of 20 to 30 with a single educator. With curriculum dictated
by the State, even if a teacher could implement change, the weight of the
social fabric of our educational bureaucracy limits any genuine possibility
"We need to
break up our State educational monopoly and use financial techniques, such
as tuition vouchers, to work for the changes necessary in tomorrow's information
age. It's the parents and the teachers who create education not Gray
Davis, nor the Legislature, nor the teachers union, no matter how small
the classes. Direct application of knowledge should be the foundation
of our schools rather than drab regimental training, or lock step memorization.
End compulsory education of high schools students, and you will see our
standards rise. Education should be a desired commodity not a forced
State re-education camp.
"The fact is
our information continues to double every 18 months. The new skills
of leaning technology cannot be provided by our current educational system.
By the year 2020, computers and machines will be such an integral combination
that the much heralded information technology will change the face of labor.
We need to change our educational system to prepare our children for that
* Public Transportation
"Only the private
economy can create a public transportation system that will serve the poor.
Proposals to build light rail systems and increase bus service are silly,
since they do not provide 'point to point' transportation. All government
subsidies for bus and light rail should be diverted immediately to vouchers
for use in purchasing "point to point" transportation by the poor."
* Encouraging Economic Growth
is the result of human innovation and creativity. When government
regulations and taxes obstruct progress, economic growth slows and our
standard of living falls. Rich people often don't feel the pain from
a slowing of growth; they have wealth to liquidate; but our poorest citizens
are most in need of economic growth to get jobs, better jobs, and pay increases.
Libertarians stand on the side of our poorest citizens and their upward
aspirations. Capitalism is all about taking dreams and ideas and
turning them into reality."
Copyright 2002 by WeeklyUniverse.com
Marcus Rubyman is a Los Angeles based tabloid reporter whose investigations specialize on UFOs and the paranormal. Read more about his journalism in Hollywood Witches
Tell Us What YOU Think! -- On Our Message